Skip to content 
State expertise of groundwater reserves - is to check not only the size of reserves and flow rates, but also the operational feasibility of the water intake, as well as the compliance of water quality with the declared purposes of use (drinking, technical, mineral, industrial or heat and power water supply). In practice, it is the «water» circuit that most often receives comments due to gaps between hydrogeological data, calculations and quality evidence: the data are available, but they are not assembled into a single, verifiable and reproducible system.
Below is the applied logic of the State Expert Review of Groundwater Reserves: how it differs from the Expert Review of Mineral Reserves, when the procedure is mandatory and when exceptions are possible, which materials are critical, as well as what comments are most frequently encountered and how to prevent them before they are submitted.
Peculiarities of the state expertise of groundwater reserves
Groundwater is a dynamic object of expertise: it is not enough to show correctness of reserves calculation. It is necessary to confirm the sustainability of the water intake operation under the declared operation mode, the absence of unacceptable consequences in terms of levels and quality, as well as taking into account the impact on the environment and other water users.
The three planes of scrutiny that drive the logic of groundwater reserve expertise:
- Aquifer system - Horizon structure, feeding and discharging, boundaries, filtration parameters, protection from pollution.
- Water intake and operation mode - well location scheme, flow rates, allowable drawdowns, operation modes, interference with neighboring water intakes, connection with surface waters and ecosystems.
- Water as a product - quality, its variability in time, compliance with the intended use, necessity and justification of water treatment, sanitary and special restrictions.
The timeframe for the examination of groundwater reserves is generally shorter than for most minerals, but this is not a «simplification». With limited time, the expert's attention is focused on the quality of the source data and the absence of contradictions between the operating regime, the calculation (or model) and the evidence of water quality.
Regulatory and Reference Materials (download):
- Resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 335 of 01.03.2023 (examination rules, terms, fees) - PDF
- Law of the Russian Federation «On Subsoil» No. 2395-1 (current version) - PDF
- Order No. 569 - materials on calculation of drinking, technical and mineral groundwater reserves - PDF
- Order No. 50 - industrial and thermal (thermal) groundwater - PDF
It is recommended to check government resources for up-to-date official publications:
When expertise is mandatory and when exceptions are possible
In practice, the question «whether groundwater reserves expertise is necessary» breaks down into two typical mistakes: (1) confusion of the conditions of obligatory expertise with the issue of competence (federal/regional contour), (2) lack of fixation of the target use and water withdrawal regime at the stage of work planning.
- Record the purpose of water use (potable/domestic, technical, mineral, industrial/heat and power).
- Determine the planned daily water withdrawal and mode of operation (base/peak, seasonality).
- Clarify the status of the subsoil plot (local or federal) and the authority's jurisdiction over your facility.
- Match the script to the terms and conditions of the license: is there an exception, what level of expertise is applicable, what materials are required.
For convenience, a practical matrix of typical situations. It helps to separate the two questions: mandatory expertise и Level of review (federal/regional).
| Situation | Whether a groundwater reserves expertise is needed | What is critical to clarify in advance |
|---|---|---|
| Extraction of groundwater for drinking/household or technical water supply ≤ 100 m3/day | An exception to the «pre-mining examination» requirement is allowed in certain cases» | Purpose of use, actual daily volume, status of water intake, license conditions and presence/absence of signs of local importance |
| Extraction of groundwater for drinking/household or technical water supply > 100 m3/day | Typically, an examination is required | Competence by subsoil area (federal/regional contour) and composition of materials according to Order No. 569 |
| Groundwater of local significance (typical range - up to 500 m3/day for drinking/technical water supply) | Examination may be conducted in a regional circuit | Who is authorized for your subsoil area, and to which budget the payment is made (federal/subject of the Russian Federation) |
| Mineral groundwater and other cases with high quality requirements and operating regimes | A full evidential circuit (including a quality block) is almost always required | List of mandatory quality and regime confirmations, consistency with intended use and operational constraints |
For correct budget planning and to avoid payee errors, see the series article: «Fee for state expertise of reserves: calculation and payment procedure».
Groundwater materials: what is critical
Groundwater materials should allow the expert to evaluate simultaneously: (1) sustainability of flow rates and reserves и (2) compliance of water quality with the purpose of use, including the prediction under operational conditions and constraints that become mandatory to be taken into account.
Critical material blocks (universal structure for groundwater reserves expertise):
- Baseline data and field studies: well descriptions, sampling, regime observations, pilot infiltration works, quality analytics (with sampling program and laboratory unit).
- Hydrogeological model (conceptual and/or mathematical): boundaries, layering, feeding/unloading, parameters, calibration from observations; in modeling, model files and key results uploads.
- Calculation of reserves and forecast of exploitation: well flow rates, allowable drawdowns, impact on neighboring water intakes, justification of regimes, uncertainty assessment (stability checks).
- Water quality: compliance with standards for the stated purpose, variability, prediction of quality change during operation and control/water treatment measures as part of the operational constraints.
- Sanitary and special confirmations (if necessary): documents on use regimes, restrictions and requirements (for drinking water and other special cases - in the applicable scope).
- Monitoring program: control of levels, flow rates, chemical composition and risk factors, frequency, observation points, responsibilities.
For requirements for electronic formats and mandatory duplication of tables/calculations in editable form, see the article: «File formats for state stockpile examination: requirements and errors».
Hydrogeology and water quality: problem areas
In the State Expert Review of Groundwater Reserves, most comments arise at the interface between hydrodynamics (levels, flow rates, interactions), quality (composition, stability) and operational regime (how exactly the intake will work).
High risk areas where observations are most likely to occur:
- Insufficient proof of filtration parameters: parameters are assumed by analogy but are not confirmed by tests or are not consistent with regime observations.
- Unaccounted interaction of water intakes: the calculation is performed without analyzing the influence of existing sources and interference.
- Water quality is presented as a static table: analytical results are available, but the screening program, assessment of seasonality/variability and prediction of change during operation are missing.
- Inconsistency of quality and intended use: the water is declared as drinking/utility or mineral water, but the logic for confirming compliance with the requirements is not disclosed or operational limitations are not formulated.
- Sanitary protection zones (for drinking water): the section exists formally, but is not linked to horizon protection and actual site conditions.
- Modeling without verifiability: model project file is attached, but key results are not duplicated in verifiable formats.
Typical remarks and how to prevent them
Below is a list of typical groundwater observations and preventive measures. Each item directly affects the possibility of objective verification of declared reserves and operation mode.
| Typical remark | Why does it arise | How to Prevent Before You Serve |
|---|---|---|
| No traceability of source data (wells/samples/testing) to final calculations | No data registry, versions are mixed, tables are not linked to the primary | Establish source data inventory, record versions; ensure uniform well/sample identifiers in all sections |
| The calculation of reductions/debits does not take into account interference and external boundaries | Overly simplified scheme with no operational scenarios or description of assumptions | Add scenario block (base + peak regimes), consider neighboring intakes/boundaries; describe assumptions and assumption checks |
| Water quality is confirmed formally, without a program and logic of selection | There is a «table of analyses» but no methodology, no frequency, no assessment of variability | Include sampling program (points/seasonality), list of indicators, laboratory information; show quality stability and prognosis during operation |
| Sanitary protection zones are not justified by hydrogeology | The «ZDF» section is prepared in a formulaic manner and is not related to horizon protection | Link ZSOs to hydrogeological scheme, protection and risk sources; synchronize with quality documents |
| The modeling materials are unverifiable | There is a model file, but no uploads, control tables, or explanation of the structure | Duplicate key deliverables (tables/balances/graphics) in auditable formats and describe the model configuration |
| Files and tables unsuitable for verification (scans, «pictures» instead of Excel) | Electronic format requirements violated | Perform technical pre-check before submission; tables and calculations - in .xls/.xlsx with formulas; PDF - readable, with text layer |
FAQ
1) How does the examination of groundwater reserves differ from the examination of mineral reserves?
Water reserves are inseparable from operation mode and quality. The expertise evaluates not only the calculation, but also the stability of water withdrawal (drawdowns, interactions, forecast) and compliance of water with the stated purpose.
2) Is an appraisal needed for a single well?
Depends on the purpose and volume of abstraction, the status of the subsoil site and the terms of the license. For project manageability, record the purpose, daily withdrawal and operational scenario prior to preparation of materials.
3) What are the most common water quality issues?
Not to the analyses themselves, but to the evidentiary logic: sampling program, comparability of samples, seasonality/variability, laboratory part and quality prediction in operation.
4) Is mathematical modeling mandatory?
Not a universal requirement. But in complex environments (interference, proximity of surface water, heterogeneities, quality risks) modeling is often a key proof. If a model is applied, its results should be verifiable (uploads/tables/checks) and not limited to the project file.
5) What has the maximum effect to reduce the risk of suspension?
(1) Register of source data and versions (wells/tests/samples/analyses). (2) Scenario check of the operating mode taking into account interference. (3) Technical pre-checking of the electronic set against format requirements prior to downloading.